[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is this a bug in cperl mode
From: |
Daniel Pfeiffer |
Subject: |
Re: Is this a bug in cperl mode |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Feb 2003 22:26:48 +0100 |
Harry Putnam <hgp@sbcglobal.net> skribis:
> I get:
> forward-sexp: Scan error: "Unbalanced parentheses", 169, 212
That's the $opt_s which is recognized as a substitution s)...)...)
> Daniel writes:
> > such single occurences of 's' they're a nightmare in both variants.
> Seems like regular perl-mode deals with that. At least in this case.
> Can code be stolen or example drawn from it?
Oh no, it's far worse! Give it a nice s/a'b/y"z/ and watch it get lost.
Recognizing s (and its kin) is definitely the right thing to do. Alas it's
hard to do perfectly...
> Oh and can some thing be set so that
> if(some_test){
> some_action
> }
> Isn't expanded into:
> if (some_test) {
> some_action
> }
Sounds like one of the hairy options. Btw. I just checked, I don't have
hairy on, because I didn't like it. And after all hairy doesn't influence
the s))) scan.
coralament / best Grötens / liebe Grüße / best regards / elkorajn salutojn
Daniel Pfeiffer
-- GPL 3: take the wind out of Palladium's sails! --
------
-- My other stuff here too, sawfish, make.pl...: --
------
-- http://dapfy.bei.t-online.de/ --
Re: Is this a bug in cperl mode, Daniel Pfeiffer, 2003/02/11
Re: CPerl mode v5.0, Ilya Zakharevich, 2003/02/17
Re: CPerl mode v5.0, Ilya Zakharevich, 2003/02/17
Re: CPerl mode v5.0, Daniel Pfeiffer, 2003/02/19
Re: CPerl mode v5.0, Ilya Zakharevich, 2003/02/20