|
From: | Rodney Sparapani |
Subject: | Re: Another word for "path"? |
Date: | Fri, 14 Feb 2003 10:04:26 -0600 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS sun4u; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020920 Netscape/7.0 |
Kai Großjohann wrote:
I agree that "localname" is confusing. It seems to me that "/path/to/file" is what the emacs documentation calls "directory", i.e. "directory/file". Also, the documentation mentions "absolute path name" which would start with either / or ~. I might further qualify it by "absolute/relative path name" when I'm referring to the concept of "directory/file". As a final thought, I have also struggled with the GNU Emacs/elisp Coding Standards and I think it would be helpful if they addressed both "path" and "file name" with examples thatHm? There are two kinds of Tramp filenames, multi-hop names and normal names. Normal names look like this: /method:user@host:/path/to/file Multi-hop names look like this (using "[...]" to indicate that I've left out something): /multi:m1:u1@h1:m2:u2@h2:[...]:mN:uN@hN:/path/to/file In both cases, I'm looking for a word that describes "/path/to/file". So if a hostname is mentioned in "/path/to/file", it will not be interpreted specially. It *is* somewhat confusing that the "localname" names a file on a remote host, but that just depends on the way you look at it...
demonstrate what the standards actually want (perhaps this will do :o). -- Rodney Sparapani Medical College of Wisconsin Sr. Biostatistician Patient Care & Outcomes Research rsparapa@mcw.edu http://www.mcw.edu/pcor Was 'Name That Tune' rigged? WWLD -- What Would Lombardi Do
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |