[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Off-topic: Plain text, XML or LaTex?
From: |
Mac |
Subject: |
Re: Off-topic: Plain text, XML or LaTex? |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Jun 2003 09:24:51 GMT |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090024 (Oort Gnus v0.24) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) |
After reading your posts, I think I'll start by trying out the
"XML/docbook in XAE" solution.
I like the fact that XML is machine-processable, and the theory that
it can be converted to other formats (HTML, PDF, hmm, should it not be
able to generate "reader friendly" plain-text as well?;-), not
forgetting the "sales factor" it has.
I'll just have to sacrify the typhographic defects for now. I'll also
take a note of the issue regarding different versions of XML/docbook.
Thank you all for your comments and links, I really appreciated
everything.
/mac
Summary of your links:
XML Authoring Environment for Emacs
(http://xae.sunsite.dk)
XML, a new start for the Web
(http://tex.loria.fr/xml-etc/goossens-xml2000.pdf)
PassiveTeX: from XML to PDF
(http://home.cern.ch/goossens/goossensrahtz.ps.gz)
- Off-topic: Plain text, XML or LaTex?, Mac, 2003/06/23
- Re: Off-topic: Plain text, XML or LaTex?, Phillip Lord, 2003/06/23
- Re: Off-topic: Plain text, XML or LaTex?,
Mac <=
- Re: Off-topic: Plain text, XML or LaTex?, Martin Stemplinger, 2003/06/23
- Re: Off-topic: Plain text, XML or LaTex?, Ted Zlatanov, 2003/06/23
- Re: Off-topic: Plain text, XML or LaTex?, Jeffery B. Rancier, 2003/06/23
- Re: Off-topic: Plain text, XML or LaTex?, address@hidden, 2003/06/23
- Re: Off-topic: Plain text, XML or LaTex?, Kai Großjohann, 2003/06/24
- Message not available