[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: OT spamfilter
From: |
A . L . Meyers |
Subject: |
Re: OT spamfilter |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Nov 2003 11:23:20 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Hi! Many of the M$ security patches are bogus spam. To stop such
things from getting to your disk you might like to use a spam filter,
e. g. mailfilter, works nicely with fetchmail.
Cheers!
Lucien
--
If you receive this by error, please delete it and inform the sender.
Key fingerprint: 8994 CFDD 9C60 C978 A488 689F 5DCC EFC4 4D36 580D
To Big Brother Echelon from "spook":
Afghanistan Iraq Treasury Bin Ladin Ft. Bragg Sudan BND White House bomb
- Re: w3 under development or not?, (continued)
- Re: w3 under development or not?, Peter Lee, 2003/11/14
- Re: w3 under development or not?, Ted Zlatanov, 2003/11/14
- Re: w3 under development or not?, Peter Lee, 2003/11/14
- Re: w3 under development or not?, Ted Zlatanov, 2003/11/14
- Re: w3 under development or not?, Peter Lee, 2003/11/14
- Re: w3 under development or not?, Juri Linkov, 2003/11/15
- Re: w3 under development or not?, Ted Zlatanov, 2003/11/15
- Re: w3 under development or not?, Alan Mackenzie, 2003/11/17
- Re: w3 under development or not?, Harry Putnam, 2003/11/14
- Gnus attachment downloading blocks other Emacs interaction (was: w3 under development or not?), Ted Zlatanov, 2003/11/14
- Re: OT spamfilter,
A . L . Meyers <=
- Re: OT spamfilter, Harry Putnam, 2003/11/14
- Re: OT spamfilter, A . L . Meyers, 2003/11/15
- Re: OT spamfilter, Tim McNamara, 2003/11/14
Re: w3 under development or not?, Joe Corneli, 2003/11/12