[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?
From: |
Tim Johnson |
Subject: |
Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why? |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Dec 2005 14:22:48 -0900 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
* Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> [051212 13:37]:
<.....>
> I have yet to see a keyboard with arrow keys close to the rest of the
> keys. They are always somewhere on the fringes.
> So, habits aside,
I use a small footprint logitech keyboard like the one shown
here:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0000BVBJS/sr=1-217/qid=1134429115/ref=sr_1_217/104-6609881-4501504?%5Fencoding=UTF8
The arrow keys are below SHIFT and the the right of the spacebar, and
are handy as an option, certainly much handier than the standard
keyboard configuration - but the control key combinations are still
preferable to me, so it is nice to have the choice.
And I have a stand-alone numeric keypad on the left, with a trackball
on the right. I find as a programmer that the less I move my hands the
more productive I have and the less typing errors.
> the distance to C-f is shorter than to the right arrow key, and that
> is an objective fact. Of course, people might prefer a less efficient
> way, e.g., if they type so slowly that the additional time is
> negligible.
In the *nix environment similar key combinations can be used widely
in other applications: i.e. midnight commander, the shell and netscape,
as just examples.
tim
--
Tim Johnson <tim@johnsons-web.com>
http://www.alaska-internet-solutions.com
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Edward Dodge, 2005/12/09
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, address@hidden, 2005/12/10
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Peter Dyballa, 2005/12/10
- Message not available
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, address@hidden, 2005/12/10
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Lennart Borgman, 2005/12/10
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/12/10
- Message not available
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Mathias Dahl, 2005/12/12
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/12/12
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Lennart Borgman, 2005/12/12
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?,
Tim Johnson <=
- Message not available
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Mathias Dahl, 2005/12/13
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Ralf Angeli, 2005/12/13
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Tim Johnson, 2005/12/13
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/12/13
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Björn Lindström, 2005/12/15
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Xavier Maillard, 2005/12/15
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, don provan, 2005/12/17
- Message not available
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Mathias Dahl, 2005/12/19
- Message not available
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Stefan Monnier, 2005/12/15
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Mathias Dahl, 2005/12/15