Re: pasting many times

[Sam Peterson]

David Kastrup wrote:

> I'd start M-y with the first entry of the kill-ring.  It would
> probably make M-y more popular than C-y, but people might learn to
> live with that.  It would probably also make sense to have C-y
> accept a multiplier argument (probably more expected) while letting
> M-y accept a stack pointer argument.
> 
> So if you were certain to need only the most recent kill, you'd use
> C-y, and if you _might_ want a different kill, you'd use M-y.

I completely agree with this.  It's intuitive, it makes sense.  What
would it take to implement it?

-- 
Sam Peterson
skpeterson At nospam ucdavis.edu
"if programmers were paid to remove code instead of adding it,
software would be much better" -- unknown