Link to Iran Holocaust Conference

[thermate]

A link to Iran holocaust conference ?

http://judicial-inc.biz/Toben_Iran_Holocaust.htm

thermate@india.com wrote:
> http://www.nkusa.org/activities/Conferences/2006Dec12Iran.cfm
>
> Related Links:
>
>     * Transcript of Speech prepared by Rabbi Yisroel Dovid Weiss (will
> be available soon - please check back)
>     * Transcript of Speech prepared by Rabbi Yisroel Feldman
>     * Audio clip of Speech prepared by Rabbi Yisroel Dovid Weiss (will
> be available soon - please check back)
>     * Transcript of Speech delivered by R. Aharon Cohen
>
>
>
> thermate@india.com wrote:
> > we know that The World Trade Center was intentionally demolished by a
> > high-energy causal process physically unrelated to plane crashes and
> > resulting fires
> >
> > we know that The World Trade Center was intentionally demolished by a
> > high-energy causal process physically unrelated to plane crashes and
> > resulting fires
> >
> > we know that The World Trade Center was intentionally demolished by a
> > high-energy causal process physically unrelated to plane crashes and
> > resulting fires
> >
> > thermate@india.com wrote:
> > > 911 government account is now PROVABLY FALSE - Why are the BASTARDS
> > > QUIET ?
> > >
> > > We know, the mass murder was done by YANK and ZIONIST Bastards
> > > together, and blamed on OBL to invade Afghanistan and Iraq. Now, they
> > > are back to square 1, on China's Back after Hainan, to increase the
> > > currency value. Did anyone see those desperate pictures of Bush in
> > > INDIA, sucking up to Manmohan Singh? Leaning extra six inches in the
> > > photos towards Manmohan to FLATTER the Indian people. Certainly, there
> > > is some BOOT-STRAPPING of Indian Image and economy to scare China after
> > > having exploited their country for decades as a vast SLAVE LABOR camp
> > > and then blaming them for running it !!! Remember, how Bush was unhappy
> > > at the Death of Kalpana Chawala, cherry picked to create the MYTH of
> > > US-India friendship? But the shuttle blew up - a divine act against the
> > > ANTI-CHRIST. Now they have cherry picked another Indian girl. Yet
> > > others are some Zionist Neocon advisors helping specific Indian
> > > industries to make image making rise, eg Mettal. The idea is to
> > > purposely sabotage China's global rise and steady progress. The Bush
> > > and Neocon principle of politics is by deception, spying, scaring and
> > > myth-making. It has been very successful in the PAST. The creation of
> > > Israel on the land of Palestine was thru the false myth as the Rabbi's
> > > of Neturei Karta have explained to us. The free book on the internet,
> > > Min Ha Mitzer, From the Depths or "Holocaust Victims Accuse" [the
> > > zionists] is available as a pdf for download. Its written wy Rabbi
> > > Wasserman who was himself in the Aushwitz. Similarly, 911 was a fake
> > > myth.Its best described in the words of Philosophy Professor James
> > > Fetzer.
> > >
> > > footnote: Bush's pretense of RELOGISITY is a MYTH. He screwed numerous
> > > girls in his drinking years.
> > >
> > > www.st911.org
> > >
> > > he Science of 9/11: What's Controversial, What's Not
> > >
> > > Propaganda by the government and the corporate media would have us
> > > believe that the 9/11 "inside job" hypothesis is not merely
> > > controversial but unsupported by proof. That is wrong. Academics,
> > > experts, and scholars who have examined the physical evidence and
> > > considered this event within its historical context tend to converge in
> > > agreement that the inside-job hypothesis is, in fact, strongly
> > > supported by the available evidence, while the version advanced in The
> > > 9/11 Commission Report is not only false but provably false and in
> > > crucial respects physically impossible. That the official account of
> > > 9/11 is a lie and that 9/11 appears to have been an inside job is no
> > > longer a matter of serious scientific debate.
> > >
> > > Even though the broad outlines of what happened are no longer
> > > controversial--for example, we know that The World Trade Center was
> > > intentionally demolished by a high-energy causal process physically
> > > unrelated to plane crashes and resulting fires--the precise details of
> > > how the perpetrators carried out the attack remains the subject of
> > > intense controversy. From a political point of view, this controversy
> > > may be insignificant. What we know with relative certainty about 9/11
> > > is already the story of the century: it demands re-thinking our
> > > history, our politics, perhaps even our way of life. But from a
> > > scientific rather than political standpoint, controversial questions
> > > about what may have happened on 9/11 are fascinating and
> > > challenging--not least of all because they could lead to a better
> > > understanding of 9/11 with respect to its social and political
> > > significance.
> > >
> > > In an attempt to clarify these matters, Scholars for 9/11 Truth will be
> > > hosting a conference entitled "The Science of 9/11: What's
> > > Controversial, What's Not", to be held in mid- to late-July in Madison,
> > > WI. I think we can all agree that the most important dimension of our
> > > efforts is explaining why the "official account" that the government
> > > has advanced cannot be sustained. Since there can be disagreements even
> > > here about what we should or should not emphasize and what has or has
> > > not been proven to an extent that is sufficient to emphasize them as
> > > "refutations" of the government's account, I am inviting Barrie Zwicker
> > > to organize the opening session, a panel discussion on "disproofs" of
> > > the government's account.
> > >
> > > Following the opening session, there will be a keynote speaker and five
> > > major sessions devoted to the issues that have tended to divide us. As
> > > the program chair, I am inviting Steve Jones to organize a panel
> > > discussion of the use of conventional means for destroying the Twin
> > > Towers. [Editor's note: I regret to report that Steve Jones has
> > > declined.] I am inviting Judy Wood to organize a panel discussion on
> > > non-conventional means, including high-tech directed energy weaponry,
> > > that might have been used to destroy the World Trade Center. I am
> > > inviting Morgan Reynolds to organize a panel on planes/no planes at the
> > > WTC and George Nelson on the Pentagon and Shanksville. Each of these
> > > sessions would be of 2 1/2 to 3 hours duration. I anticipate there will
> > > be a registration fee of $100 for the week-end long conference, which
> > > will include a keynote address on Saturday evening.
> > >
> > > While the program is at its tentative and preliminary stage, I am open
> > > to suggestions for possible participants and additional topics. There
> > > may be changes in the individuals responsible for some of these panels,
> > > but my expectation would be that their focus will remain the same.
> > > Anyone who has ideas they would like to share with me is welcome to
> > > forward them to me at jfetzer@d.umn.edu at their earliest convenience.
> > > This conference should provide an opportunity for experts on complex
> > > and technical scientific questions to explain their research and its
> > > significance. My hope is that by "agreeing to disagree," and by
> > > subjecting each others' research to rigorous but collegial criticism,
> > > the attention-getting controversial aspects of 9/11 research may be
> > > turned into a benefit, rather than a distraction, in the larger process
> > > of seeking and exposing the truth about 9/11.
> > >
> > > 
> > > James H. Fetzer
> > > Founder
> > > Scholars for 9/11 Truth