Re: How to redefine Parantheses?

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Ralf Angeli <dev.null@caeruleus.net>
> Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2007 19:37:36 +0200
> 
> Even with that feature missing one could get 100% correct behavior by
> giving guillemets punctuation syntax.  You may give the problem a
> different name, but changing the default syntax is ceteris paribus
> still the better option.

Ah, but other things are not really the same, since I don't regard the
behavior you want as 100% correct.