[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: random predicate function
From: |
Pascal J. Bourguignon |
Subject: |
Re: random predicate function |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Dec 2010 16:20:05 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) |
Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:
> I agree the CL macros are nicer, but the non-macro version is much
> easier to debug *in GNU Emacs* and it's already installed. So they both
> have benefits.
I don't see how code without macros is easier to debug, there are so
many macros in lisp code.
> Can your `shuffle' be part of cl-extra.el in Emacs? I like the brevity
> of it, and it's a good example of how to use `loop' properly.
shuffle is not a Common Lisp function, so it should not be added to
cl-extra, but it could be included in an emacs lisp library.
--
__Pascal Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/
A bad day in () is better than a good day in {}.
- Re: random predicate function, (continued)
Re: random predicate function, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2010/12/13
Re: random predicate function, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/12/13
- Re: random predicate function, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2010/12/13
- Re: random predicate function, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/12/15
- Re: random predicate function,
Pascal J. Bourguignon <=
- Re: random predicate function, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/12/15
- Re: random predicate function, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2010/12/15
- Re: random predicate function, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/12/15
RE: random predicate function, Drew Adams, 2010/12/15