Re: Emacs as a C Programming IDE Configuration?

[Pascal J. Bourguignon]

Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:

> On Mon, 09 May 2011 03:42:00 +0200 "Pascal J. Bourguignon" 
> <pjb@informatimago.com> wrote: 
>
> PJB> dkcombs@panix.com (David Combs) writes:
>>> In article <icbozrvfyj.fsf@verizon.net>,  <despen@verizon.net> wrote:
>>>> Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> writes:
>>>> 
>>> ...
>>>> 
>>>> More important, a true emacs user has little need for a shell.
>>> 
>>> You gotta be kidding -- no use for M-x shell????
>
> PJB> Almost none.  You can always use M-! <command> RET
>
> Let's not forget eshell, the Adventure shell, and zsh.

Yes, Adventure shell is the only shell worth using with M-x shell, along
with:

> Oh, and some consider Tcl/Tk's `wish' a "simple windowing shell" ;)

      scsh.


-- 
__Pascal Bourguignon__                     http://www.informatimago.com/
A bad day in () is better than a good day in {}.