[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs vs Scrivener
From: |
Susan Cragin |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs vs Scrivener |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Nov 2012 10:37:04 -0500 (GMT-05:00) |
>Has anyone tried out Scrivener? I'm curious if does anything (substantive)that
>Emacs cannot do.
I have tried it. It's strengths are its user-friendly non-computer-literate
interface and print-friendly functions.
If you have Linux there is a free downloadable version. I think there is a
30-day trial for other systems.
I used it for a while and went back to emacs. Emacs is fine if you know the
basic procedure for writing a book, and if you are familiar with org commands.
- Emacs vs Scrivener, drain, 2012/11/19
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener,
Susan Cragin <=
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, Xavier Maillard, 2012/11/20
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, drain, 2012/11/20
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, Bastien, 2012/11/21
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, Matt Price, 2012/11/21
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, Matt Price, 2012/11/22
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, Burton Samograd, 2012/11/22
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, Matt Price, 2012/11/26
- Message not available
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, William Gardella, 2012/11/27
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, Bastien, 2012/11/24
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, Eric Abrahamsen, 2012/11/24