[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Generating a listing of all symbols (16K+) and labeling subsets
From: |
Nicolas Richard |
Subject: |
Re: Generating a listing of all symbols (16K+) and labeling subsets |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Apr 2014 22:47:04 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.90 (gnu/linux) |
Hans BKK <hansbkk@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Nicolas Richard
>> Some symbols are just symbols. every time the lisp reader reads
>> something, symbols are interned.
>>
>> Currently I have 76920 symbols in obarray.
>
> Aha. OK, so those "just symbols" can go to dev null.
I don't know what that should mean. Some symbols will never be reused,
some I don't know if they will be reused, some are still used (e.g.
because they serve as identifier), and many probably serve a purpose I
am not aware of.
If you like numbers, here are some :
(yf/count-symbols)
=> 77064
(yf/count-symbols #'fboundp)
=> 27896
(yf/count-symbols #'boundp)
=> 13713
;; the intersecton of the two previous sets:
(yf/count-symbols (lambda (x) (and (fboundp x) (boundp x))))
=> 792
(yf/count-symbols
(lambda (x)
(and
(symbol-plist x)
(not (fboundp x))
(not (boundp x)))))
=> 3136
(yf/count-symbols #'facep)
=> 673
(there's obviously some overlapping with bound and fbound symbols)
(yf/count-symbols #'keywordp)
=> 1510
So, are all the other symbols unneeded ? Dunno.
FWIW, here's the yf/count-symbols that I used:
(defun yf/count-symbols (&optional predicate)
(let ((count 0))
(mapatoms
(lambda (x)
(when (or (not predicate)
(funcall predicate x))
(incf count))))
count))
> Question remains - how to separate out and ID - in the absence of a
> predicate - any that actually may be of interest remaining in my
> current "other" - which I presume macros should be, and having got
> code for keymaps already above.
macros are fboundp.
(defmacro asymbollikenoother () t)
(fboundp 'asymbollikenoother)
=> t
>
>> If you want to have a report of useful symbols used in a package you can
>> do e.g. for smerge-mode:
>> M-x apropos RET ^smerge- RET
>
> Thanks for that, looks useful. But looks to only pick up those
> starting with the package string?
That was the idea, yes. Most packages are namespaced that way, those
that aren't probably should not exist in an ideal world ;)
> And I think apropos only displays a
> limited subset, e.g. only Customized variables? and/or only those with
> docstrings?
C-h f a p r o p o s RET
=>
Show all meaningful Lisp symbols whose names match PATTERN.
Symbols are shown if they are defined as functions, variables, or
faces, or if they have nonempty property lists.
> In this context I'm aiming more for an all-in-one standard "state
> report" I can diff between any arbitrary emacs-config-A and
> emacs-config-B, showing all changes, including to existing system
> variables.
I'm not sure if you can get meaningful data, doing that.
--
Nico.
- Generating a listing of all symbols (16K+) and labeling subsets, hansbkk, 2014/04/18
- Generating a listing of all symbols (16K+) and labeling subsets, Hans BKK, 2014/04/18
- Re: Generating a listing of all symbols (16K+) and labeling subsets, Hans BKK, 2014/04/18
- Re: Generating a listing of all symbols (16K+) and labeling subsets,
Nicolas Richard <=
- Re: Generating a listing of all symbols (16K+) and labeling subsets, Hans BKK, 2014/04/18
- Re: Generating a listing of all symbols (16K+) and labeling subsets, Hans BKK, 2014/04/18
- Re: Generating a listing of all symbols (16K+) and labeling subsets, Hans BKK, 2014/04/19
- Re: Generating a listing of all symbols (16K+) and labeling subsets, Hans BKK, 2014/04/23
- Re: Generating a listing of all symbols (16K+) and labeling subsets, Hans BKK, 2014/04/23