[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 64 bit official Windows builds
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: 64 bit official Windows builds |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Feb 2016 08:58:45 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> Could I ask, what is the benefit of 64 bits compared to 32 bits for windows ?
> It will run roughly twice faster.
[...]
> slower, because running a 32-bit executable on a 64-bit Windows
> requires expensive thunking for every call to any Windows API,
Holy crap? Really? It's hard to believe that 64-bit Windows's
emulation of the 32-bit API is so inefficient that it causes a "rough
slowdown" by a factor 2 in an application like Emacs.
Do you see such a factor-of-2 difference when doing "rm lisp/**/*.elc;
make"? Or in which kind of circumstance have you seen such a slowdown?
Stefan
- Re: 64 bit official Windows builds, moocow062, 2016/02/08
- Re: 64 bit official Windows builds, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/02/08
- Re: 64 bit official Windows builds, Óscar Fuentes, 2016/02/08
- Re: 64 bit official Windows builds,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: 64 bit official Windows builds, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/02/11
- Re: 64 bit official Windows builds, Óscar Fuentes, 2016/02/11
- Re: 64 bit official Windows builds, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/02/12
- Re: 64 bit official Windows builds, Óscar Fuentes, 2016/02/12
- Re: 64 bit official Windows builds, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/02/12
- Re: 64 bit official Windows builds, Óscar Fuentes, 2016/02/12
- Re: 64 bit official Windows builds, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/02/12
Re: 64 bit official Windows builds, djc, 2016/02/08