[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (interactive) call or form?
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: (interactive) call or form? |
Date: |
Sun, 08 Apr 2018 16:52:55 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) |
Michael Heerdegen wrote:
> The manual very often calls it a "form", so
> it's probably ok to use this term.
Just who is expected to read Borkowski's
article? Because "form" isn't that widely known
and in the Lisp sense it isn't even included in
@book{oxford-dictionary-of-computing,
title = {Oxford Dictionary of Computing},
author = {John Daintith and Edmund Wright},
publisher = {Oxford University Press},
year = 2010,
ISBN = 0199234000
}
--
underground experts united
http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573