[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (interactive) call or form?
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: (interactive) call or form? |
Date: |
Mon, 09 Apr 2018 20:46:31 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) |
Michael Heerdegen wrote:
>> form" but don't understand "form"? In a way,
>> yes, because "special form" sounds like
>> something you don't understand, while "form"
>> sounds like something you would understand,
>> only you don't (probably), so it is
>> more confusing.
>
> These words name different things anyway: the
> first one is about the binding of the
> function cell of the symbol `interactive',
> the other names the whole s-exp "(interactive
> ...)". AFAIU the OP wanted a description of
> the latter.
Say what? :)
--
underground experts united
http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573