[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ESC vs Meta for shifted keys
From: |
Yuri Khan |
Subject: |
Re: ESC vs Meta for shifted keys |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Apr 2018 23:35:31 +0700 |
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 11:16 PM, Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com> wrote:
> Itʼs pretty clear to me: the current situation allows users of R2L
> text to choose visual or logical moving without impacting L2R users at
> all, so I see no need to change anything.
On the other hand, the same choice is available with M-b and M-f for
logical order, M-left and M-right for visual order. And it makes
intuitive sense for direction keys to move point in their
corresponding directions.
- Re: ESC vs Meta for shifted keys, (continued)
- Re: ESC vs Meta for shifted keys, Bob Proulx, 2018/04/10
- Re: ESC vs Meta for shifted keys, Stefan Monnier, 2018/04/11
- Re: ESC vs Meta for shifted keys, Bob Proulx, 2018/04/11
- Re: ESC vs Meta for shifted keys, Stefan Monnier, 2018/04/11
- RE: ESC vs Meta for shifted keys, Drew Adams, 2018/04/11
- Re: ESC vs Meta for shifted keys, Robert Pluim, 2018/04/12
- RE: ESC vs Meta for shifted keys, Drew Adams, 2018/04/12
- Re: ESC vs Meta for shifted keys, Robert Pluim, 2018/04/12
- RE: ESC vs Meta for shifted keys, Drew Adams, 2018/04/12
- Re: ESC vs Meta for shifted keys, Robert Pluim, 2018/04/12
- Re: ESC vs Meta for shifted keys,
Yuri Khan <=
- Re: ESC vs Meta for shifted keys, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/04/12
- Re: ESC vs Meta for shifted keys, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/04/12
- Re: ESC vs Meta for shifted keys, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/04/12
Re: ESC vs Meta for shifted keys, Emanuel Berg, 2018/04/10