[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is Elisp really that slow?
From: |
Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: |
Re: Is Elisp really that slow? |
Date: |
Wed, 15 May 2019 16:30:10 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 |
On 15.05.2019 16:25, Óscar Fuentes wrote:
OTOH C-Mode supports M-; (comment-dwim) which is an standard method of
(un)commenting code in Emacs.
Right. So why the other binding?
Pretending that every mode conforms to the same rules is
counterproductive, because there are vast differences among them.
We also have different bindings for similar things in similar modes.
We
shall strive for pragmatism, not for bureaucracy.
Sure, but I don't understand your negative reaction in this case.
- Re: Is Elisp really that slow?, Ergus, 2019/05/14
- Re: Is Elisp really that slow?, Emanuel Berg, 2019/05/15
- Re: Is Elisp really that slow?, Dmitry Gutov, 2019/05/15
- Re: Is Elisp really that slow?, Óscar Fuentes, 2019/05/15
- Re: Is Elisp really that slow?,
Dmitry Gutov <=
- Re: Is Elisp really that slow?, Óscar Fuentes, 2019/05/15
- Re: Is Elisp really that slow?, Dmitry Gutov, 2019/05/15
- Re: Is Elisp really that slow?, Óscar Fuentes, 2019/05/15
- Re: Is Elisp really that slow?, Dmitry Gutov, 2019/05/15
- Re: Is Elisp really that slow?, Óscar Fuentes, 2019/05/15
- Re: Is Elisp really that slow?, Óscar Fuentes, 2019/05/15
- Re: Is Elisp really that slow?, Dmitry Gutov, 2019/05/15
- Re: Is Elisp really that slow?, Dmitry Gutov, 2019/05/15
- Re: Is Elisp really that slow?, Óscar Fuentes, 2019/05/15
- Re: Is Elisp really that slow?, Dmitry Gutov, 2019/05/15