[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [External] : Re: PROPOSAL: Repurpose one key (why only one?) and res
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: [External] : Re: PROPOSAL: Repurpose one key (why only one?) and reserve it for third-party packages |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Feb 2021 01:33:39 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Drew Adams wrote:
>> I understand your opinion but contrary to it, I found there
>> are many available key bindings, we mentioned here Super
>> key, key prefixes or maps, so it amounts in thousands.
>> Keyboard will die sooner as physical keyboard then the
>> available key bindings.
>
> I disagree.
I don't know if I disagree or agree, but note that it isn't
just a matter of the number of theoretical keybindings, it is
also what keybindings are ergonomic, short, close to asdf jkl;
(i.e. fast) perhaps mnemonic (tho that shouldn't be
over-emphasized, particularly not for stuff that is used
often, as that will bypass the brain pretty soon anyway and
enter muscle memory) and such concerns.
Good keybindings are not infinite.
--
underground experts united
http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
https://dataswamp.org/~incal
- Re: PROPOSAL: Repurpose one key and reserve it for third-party packages, (continued)
- Re: PROPOSAL: Repurpose one key and reserve it for third-party packages, Philip Kaludercic, 2021/02/13
- Re: PROPOSAL: Repurpose one key (why only one?) and reserve it for third-party packages, Jean Louis, 2021/02/13
- Re: PROPOSAL: Repurpose one key (why only one?) and reserve it for third-party packages, Philip Kaludercic, 2021/02/13
- Re: PROPOSAL: Repurpose one key (why only one?) and reserve it for third-party packages, Jean Louis, 2021/02/14
- Re: PROPOSAL: Repurpose one key (why only one?) and reserve it for third-party packages, Emanuel Berg, 2021/02/14
- Re: PROPOSAL: Repurpose one key (why only one?) and reserve it for third-party packages, Jean Louis, 2021/02/14
- RE: [External] : Re: PROPOSAL: Repurpose one key (why only one?) and reserve it for third-party packages, Drew Adams, 2021/02/14
- Re: [External] : Re: PROPOSAL: Repurpose one key (why only one?) and reserve it for third-party packages, Jean Louis, 2021/02/14
- Re: [External] : Re: PROPOSAL: Repurpose one key (why only one?) and reserve it for third-party packages, Emanuel Berg, 2021/02/14
- RE: [External] : Re: PROPOSAL: Repurpose one key (why only one?) and reserve it for third-party packages, Drew Adams, 2021/02/14
- Re: [External] : Re: PROPOSAL: Repurpose one key (why only one?) and reserve it for third-party packages,
Emanuel Berg <=
- Re: [External] : Re: PROPOSAL: Repurpose one key (why only one?) and reserve it for third-party packages, Jean Louis, 2021/02/15
- Re: PROPOSAL: Repurpose one key (why only one?) and reserve it for third-party packages, Gregory Heytings, 2021/02/14
- libraries (was: Re: PROPOSAL: Repurpose one key (why only one?) and reserve it for third-party packages), Emanuel Berg, 2021/02/14
- Re: PROPOSAL: Repurpose one key (why only one?) and reserve it for third-party packages, Philip Kaludercic, 2021/02/14
- Re: PROPOSAL: Repurpose one key (why only one?) and reserve it for third-party packages, Gregory Heytings, 2021/02/14
- Re: PROPOSAL: Repurpose one key (why only one?) and reserve it for third-party packages, Emanuel Berg, 2021/02/14
- Re: PROPOSAL: Repurpose one key (why only one?) and reserve it for third-party packages, Robert Thorpe, 2021/02/15
- Re: PROPOSAL: Repurpose one key (why only one?) and reserve it for third-party packages, Gregory Heytings, 2021/02/15
- Re: PROPOSAL: Repurpose one key (why only one?) and reserve it for third-party packages, Robert Thorpe, 2021/02/17
- Re: PROPOSAL: Repurpose one key (why only one?) and reserve it for third-party packages, Gregory Heytings, 2021/02/20