[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Debunking Emacs merits over GUI - Re: package for Email
From: |
Jean Louis |
Subject: |
Re: Debunking Emacs merits over GUI - Re: package for Email |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Jan 2023 18:40:51 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/2.2.9+54 (af2080d) (2022-11-21) |
* Bob Newell <bobnewell@bobnewell.net> [2023-01-21 22:34]:
> And a lot more besides, for example, my favorite thing, in
> conjunction with BBDB, when I write to certain mail recipients,
> Emacs is set into French, German, or Hawaiian input mode as
> appropriate. Try to do that in Thunderbird!
I find that as good integration. In my RCD Notes there is contact
management and people may have "communication language" assigned, in
turn language may have input method set.
What about relations? Person may be member of team A which has main
languag German, but in the list of people B, the main language is
English, so every relation also requires possible designation of the
language.
We could say "anything is possible" to program with almost any
programming language.
But what we do not have is integration. Integration of small features
into one.
Thunderbid shows how integration works, it helps in usability.
Emacs is full of disintegrated interesting small packages, minimizing
usability.
--
Jean
Take action in Free Software Foundation campaigns:
https://www.fsf.org/campaigns
In support of Richard M. Stallman
https://stallmansupport.org/
- Re: Debunking Emacs merits over GUI - Re: package for Email, (continued)
- Re: Debunking Emacs merits over GUI - Re: package for Email, Jean Louis, 2023/01/20
- Re: Debunking Emacs merits over GUI - Re: package for Email, Bob Newell, 2023/01/19
- Re: Debunking Emacs merits over GUI - Re: package for Email, Jean Louis, 2023/01/20
- Message not available
- Re: Debunking Emacs merits over GUI - Re: package for Email, Jean Louis, 2023/01/21
- Re: Debunking Emacs merits over GUI - Re: package for Email, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/01/21
- Re: Debunking Emacs merits over GUI - Re: package for Email, Emanuel Berg, 2023/01/21
- Re: Debunking Emacs merits over GUI - Re: package for Email, Jean Louis, 2023/01/21
- Re: Debunking Emacs merits over GUI - Re: package for Email, Jean Louis, 2023/01/21
- Re: Debunking Emacs merits over GUI - Re: package for Email, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/01/21
- Re: Debunking Emacs merits over GUI - Re: package for Email, Bob Newell, 2023/01/21
- Re: Debunking Emacs merits over GUI - Re: package for Email,
Jean Louis <=
- Re: Debunking Emacs merits over GUI - Re: package for Email, Emanuel Berg, 2023/01/21
- Re: Debunking Emacs merits over GUI - Re: package for Email, Jean Louis, 2023/01/20
- Re: Debunking Emacs merits over GUI - Re: package for Email, Milan Glacier, 2023/01/20
- Re: History Re: Debunking Emacs merits over GUI - Re: package for Email, David Masterson, 2023/01/21
- Re: History Re: Debunking Emacs merits over GUI - Re: package for Email, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/01/21
- Re: History Re: Debunking Emacs merits over GUI - Re: package for Email, tomas, 2023/01/21
- Re: History Re: Debunking Emacs merits over GUI - Re: package for Email, Emanuel Berg, 2023/01/21
- Re: History Re: Debunking Emacs merits over GUI - Re: package for Email, Bob Newell, 2023/01/21
- Re: History Re: Debunking Emacs merits over GUI - Re: package for Email, David Masterson, 2023/01/21
- Re: History Re: Debunking Emacs merits over GUI - Re: package for Email, Jean Louis, 2023/01/23