[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: How to get a concatenation of the negations with rx (ex: [^a][^b])?
From: |
Anders Munch |
Subject: |
RE: How to get a concatenation of the negations with rx (ex: [^a][^b])? |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Nov 2023 08:46:15 +0000 |
tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
> OK -- this was roughly my train of thought: build the NFA, then invert
> that... OMG. Then I decided this is better left as an exercise to the reader.
At the DFA level it's easy. So you can just convert the NFA to a DFA and work
from there. I did that exercise once upon a time, let me see if I can remember
it.
First convert to DFA. For every node, add an outgoing edge to the acceptance
state for every character that doesn't already have an outgoing node. Remove
all edges to the acceptance state that were in the original DFA.
The main problem is not implementation. It's that it's not obvious what to use
them for in the variable-length searches that regexes are typically used for.
It's just confusing that the string "abz" is a match for the regular expression
"not ab", and if you were looking for a two-character string that is not "ab",
then a general negation operator isn't going to help you, at least not by
itself.
regards,
Anders
Re: How to get a concatenation of the negations with rx (ex: [^a][^b])?, Emanuel Berg, 2023/11/13