Re: Support

[Sergei Steshenko]

>________________________________
> From: Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <address@hidden>
>To: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <address@hidden> 
>Cc: address@hidden 
>Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 5:07 PM
>Subject: Re: Support
> 
>On 29 November 2012 21:39, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
><address@hidden> wrote:
>> (That is, personally I find matlab documentation much better than octave
>> documentation, and since octave is compatible with matlab, you may as
>> well use the matlab help pages.)
>
>If you could help us improve Octave's documentation, that would be
>appreciated. Just write or amend the text as you deem necessary, and I
>can incorporate it into the Octave manual. For the Octave wiki, you
>can edit it yourself.
>
>- Jordi G. H.
>_______________________________________________
>Help-octave mailing list
>address@hidden
>https://mailman.cae.wisc.edu/listinfo/help-octave
>
>
>

Nah !

I suggested to include _direct_ links to Matlab documentation in Octave 
documentation, but Octave developers refused.

I am _very_ glad another person has guts to tell that Matlab documentation is 
_better_.

"If you can't beat them, join them" (c).


There is _no_ need in tautology.

Better spend time on burning issues like _lack_ of packaging spec (the freaded 
'pkg.m').


Regards,
  Sergei.