[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Support
From: |
Sergei Steshenko |
Subject: |
Re: Support |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Nov 2012 09:49:55 -0800 (PST) |
----- Original Message -----
> From: John W. Eaton <address@hidden>
> To: Sergei Steshenko <address@hidden>
> Cc: Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <address@hidden>; Stephen Montgomery-Smith
> <address@hidden>; "address@hidden" <address@hidden>
> Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 7:26 PM
> Subject: Re: Support
>
> On 30-Nov-2012, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
>
> | I suggested to include _direct_ links to Matlab documentation in
> | Octave documentation, but Octave developers refused.
>
> Of course we refused, because it would be an idiotic thing to do.
Why ?
The thing (the info) already _exists_.
So, to rewrite it is an idiotic thing to do.
I, as end user, see _no_ benefit in rewritten documentation. Unless you point
out _particular_ defects in Matlab documentation and fix the defects.
Otherwise don't bother.
If you do bother, you'll do an _idiotic_ thing - you squander your _very_
_limited_ resources instead of doing something _useful_ for end users.
--Sergei.
- Support, jvr_silva, 2012/11/29
- Re: Support, Doug Stewart, 2012/11/29
- Re: Support, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 2012/11/30
- Re: Support, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2012/11/30
- Re: Support, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 2012/11/30
- Re: Support, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2012/11/30
- Re: Support, Sergei Steshenko, 2012/11/30
- Re: Support, Sergei Steshenko, 2012/11/30
Re: Support, c., 2012/11/30
Re: Support, Sergei Steshenko, 2012/11/29
Re: Support, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2012/11/30