[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Support
From: |
Sergei Steshenko |
Subject: |
Re: Support |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Nov 2012 18:41:27 -0800 (PST) |
----- Original Message -----
> From: Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <address@hidden>
> To: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
> Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 10:43 PM
> Subject: Re: Support
>
[snip]
> Free software requires free
> documentation, and we are not free to distribute nor modify Matlab's
> documentation.
>
> - Jordi G. H.
GPL is the _most_ _non_-free license of all more or less free licenses.
This is because it's the most _obnoxious_ and the most end user limiting
license of all more or less free licenses.
In fact, GPL is so obnoxious it grossly contradicts my biological perception of
freedom - exactly because GPL proponents too much interfere with what end users
can and can not do with the code.
The license which _most_ corresponds to my biological perception of freedom is
WTFPL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WTFPL .
Whenever I read the word "free" from GPL proponents, I see my hypocrisy sensors
in red alert area and I feel my ears hearing 140db loud (red) alert sirens.
Regards,
Sergei.
- Re: Support, (continued)
- Re: Support, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 2012/11/30
- Re: Support, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2012/11/30
- Re: Support, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 2012/11/30
- Re: Support, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2012/11/30
- Re: Support, Sergei Steshenko, 2012/11/30
- Re: Support,
Sergei Steshenko <=
Re: Support, c., 2012/11/30
Re: Support, Sergei Steshenko, 2012/11/29
Re: Support, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2012/11/30