Re: firls.m, part 2

[Nicholas Jankowski]

On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Mike Miller <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 05:03:39 +0000, je suis wrote:
> So please test your firls function against the current expint to see if it 
> works for you.

I would add that you should take a peek at the test functions at the
end of the newer
version of expint. It has good examples testing both the basic input/output
forms as well as some expected numerical output to a certain level of
precision.