Re: firls.m, part 2

[je suis]

Using the link for expint() shows spot on results, compared to my
cooked up version.

> I notice there are still no built-in tests at the end of the current
> version.  I'd recommend adding a bunch of those for basic input/output
> form checking as well as a few (simple if possible) expected numerical
> outputs. I think one of my past emails may have included some
> examples.

There are some checks in the beginning, those should take care of too
few, or too many arguments, correct string arguments, and correct
numeric ones (thought not for N). Should I delete those and replace
them with the %! tyoe checks you gave as example?

Vlad