Re: [Help-smalltalk] Re: amd 64 and gnu smalltalk

[thomas . g . girard]

Hello all,

Indeed I maintain Debian GNU Smalltalk packages, and the version in stable is 
really old.

Would you be interested in 3.1 backport for etch?

Regards,

Thomas

----- Mail Original -----
De: "Paolo Bonzini" <address@hidden>
À: "Sean Allen" <address@hidden>
Cc: address@hidden
Envoyé: Lundi 5 Janvier 2009 17:05:36 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Berne / 
Rome / Stockholm / Vienne
Objet: Re: [Help-smalltalk] Re: amd 64 and gnu smalltalk


> No, I didn't- I only ever use the stable branch. I was tired when i
> asked the question
> and completely missed that the last stable gnu smalltalk in debian
> stable is a 2.1.x
> version.  Usually they are good about keeping packages for gnu stuff up
> to date,
> must not have a maintainer for the gnu smalltalk anymore.

No, there is one (Thomas Girard).  ISTR that testing is okay, probably
3.0.x or 3.1, because GNU Smalltalk missed by very little the deadline
for the last stabilization.

Paolo


_______________________________________________
help-smalltalk mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk