|
From: | Herbert Beadle |
Subject: | Re: [libreplanet-discuss] List of free as in freedom programming language |
Date: | Wed, 3 Feb 2016 15:43:34 -0500 |
aurelien <aurelien@hackers.camp> writes:
> Fabio Pesari <fabiop@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> On 02/03/2016 09:04 PM, aurelien wrote:
>>> Sorry, I was thinking that programming language are under license like software.
>>>
>>> So we can learn any programming language without risk in time to see it
>>> becoming more (close, proprietary, restricted ...) than another one?
>>
>> Well, for starters I would avoid languages tied to specific proprietary
>> platforms like Swift, even when their implementation is free, and those
>> languages whose official implementations have some proprietary parts
>> (like D, whose backend for DMD is nonfree), because that shows just a
>> plain disregard for the community, if anything.
>
> So it is possible to make difference between programming language.
>
> Maybe it should be great to have a table to help people.
>
> Like:
>
> + as says Kos Ros
>> - The language's standard (or specification) may be nonfree.
>> - The language's compiler or interpreter may be nonfree.
>> - The language's toolchain may contain nonfree things.
_____________________________________________________
Language|implementations|standard|compiler|toolchain|
Swift |proprietary | | | |
C | | | | |
Guile |free |free |free |free |
Go | | | | |
C++ | | | | |
C# | | | | |
.net | | | | |
--
Aurélien DESBRIÈRES
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |