Important note: I'm not a lawyer.
Trademarks aren't a problem, the problem comes from the trademark
*policy*. As an example, we have Mozilla's which limits or forbids
selling copies of the original software (the trademark policy given as
example might also have other problems that I'm unaware of).
Although I don't know what you mean by "releasing the trademark under
the GPL".
Perhaps there are lawyers that might be able to help. I don't know if
these have lawyers, but it's worth mentioning:
- Software Freedom Conservancy: <https://sfconservancy.org/>.
- Software Freedom Law Center: <https://www.softwarefreedom.org/>.
Also, the last one has an interesting guide that talks about trademarks:
<https://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2017/ancillary-rights.html>.
Julian Daich <julian.daich@freecomputerlabs.org> writes:
Hi,
I am working on a medical device and plan to release it under the GPL,
most probably the AGPL. I know that is possible to have the design the
design under the GPL, but for the physical object the situation is
more complex. I think about make a trademark that will cover the
decorative features and releasing the trademark under the GPL. Should
be possible? Have somebody try that?
Best,
Julian
_______________________________________________
libreplanet-discuss mailing list
libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss