[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] GPL for physical object
From: |
Julian Daich |
Subject: |
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] GPL for physical object |
Date: |
Sat, 7 Oct 2017 20:43:36 +0200 |
2017-10-06 13:24 GMT+02:00 Thomas Harding <tom@thomas-harding.name>:
> And that's also an ethical problem (how to allow licensing on a registered
> TM/design?).
By redacting a document.
>
> So, if you want to protect a design, the best is to use a worldwide gratis
> protection mechanism : copyright. A photography is a bidimentionnal object, a
> sculpture a tridimentionnal one.
>
A sculpture is an specific object. Non a set of objects derived from a concept.
> So, simply use CC-By-SA licence (not "NC", because that costs to produce and
> distribute physical object) for design, and GPLv3 for technical
> characteristics written as "a program" (or several programs : one per
> function or group of function (as program libraries), and one for the whole
> functions.
>
CC are not so good because they do not contemplate if patents are involved.
> Unfortunately, you cannot restrict by linking the two. That restriction would
> be on physical design, so Creative Commons could help by writing a licence
> "Share alike / enforced to Free Software". They own their licences :-)
How can I contact Creative Common for the writing?
Best,
Julian
>
> Le 6 octobre 2017 08:12:18 GMT+02:00, Ineiev <ineiev@gnu.org> a écrit :
>>On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 10:58:48PM +0200, Julian Daich wrote:
>>> My idea is define a trademark for a physical object( i.e. as Lego did
>>> with their blocks or Coca Cola with their bottle) and license this
>>> trademark using the GPL. Trademarks can only enforce decorative
>>> characteristics of the physical object, so it will possible to choose
>>> a design and materials to distinguish the libre object, enumerate
>>some
>>> functional characteristics to avoid confusions and use both to define
>>> the source. The object will be the physical object itself.
>>
>>I believe trademarks only apply to look, they can't impose any
>>requirements when someone uses your physical object internally
>>and never tells customers it's actually used in their product.
>
> --
> Envoyé de mon appareil Android avec Courriel K-9 Mail. Veuillez excuser ma
> brièveté.
> _______________________________________________
> libreplanet-discuss mailing list
> libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
> https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] GPL for physical object, Adonay Felipe Nogueira, 2017/10/04
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] GPL for physical object, John Sullivan, 2017/10/04
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] GPL for physical object, Julian Daich, 2017/10/05
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] GPL for physical object, Ineiev, 2017/10/06
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] GPL for physical object, Thomas Harding, 2017/10/06
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] GPL for physical object,
Julian Daich <=
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] GPL for physical object, Julian Daich, 2017/10/07
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] GPL for physical object, Thomas Harding, 2017/10/07
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] GPL for physical object, Julian Daich, 2017/10/08
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] GPL for physical object, Thomas Harding, 2017/10/07
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] GPL for physical object, Julian Daich, 2017/10/08
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] GPL for physical object, Julian Daich, 2017/10/07