[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] GPL for physical object
From: |
Ineiev |
Subject: |
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] GPL for physical object |
Date: |
Fri, 6 Oct 2017 02:12:18 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 10:58:48PM +0200, Julian Daich wrote:
> My idea is define a trademark for a physical object( i.e. as Lego did
> with their blocks or Coca Cola with their bottle) and license this
> trademark using the GPL. Trademarks can only enforce decorative
> characteristics of the physical object, so it will possible to choose
> a design and materials to distinguish the libre object, enumerate some
> functional characteristics to avoid confusions and use both to define
> the source. The object will be the physical object itself.
I believe trademarks only apply to look, they can't impose any
requirements when someone uses your physical object internally
and never tells customers it's actually used in their product.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] GPL for physical object, Adonay Felipe Nogueira, 2017/10/04
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] GPL for physical object, John Sullivan, 2017/10/04
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] GPL for physical object, Julian Daich, 2017/10/05
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] GPL for physical object,
Ineiev <=
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] GPL for physical object, Thomas Harding, 2017/10/06
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] GPL for physical object, Julian Daich, 2017/10/07
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] GPL for physical object, Julian Daich, 2017/10/07
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] GPL for physical object, Thomas Harding, 2017/10/07
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] GPL for physical object, Julian Daich, 2017/10/08
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] GPL for physical object, Thomas Harding, 2017/10/07
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] GPL for physical object, Julian Daich, 2017/10/08
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] GPL for physical object, Julian Daich, 2017/10/07