|
From: | Paul Sutton |
Subject: | Re: Support RMS |
Date: | Fri, 26 Mar 2021 19:02:46 +0000 |
On 26/03/2021 18:25, Thomas Lord wrote:
No "path forward" is needed in reaction to people repeating the same accusations that don't stand up to scrutiny. Where we need paths forward is in strategic and tactical decisions about what free software to try to bring into existence, and what can be done to expand the mass of people who care about and work to promote software freedom. Those are examples of what forums like this are for. -t On 2021-03-26 11:15, Danny Spitzberg wrote: Thomas, you keep using the word "lies" to refer testimonies in this thread from former FSF staff. Do you mean to say that these people are all lying? Also, more importantly, are you implying that Paul and Aaron and Deb and every proposal for a path forward is all... bad?
Part of my point was to try and suggest a policy going forward ensures that any accusations made in the future, however trivial they may seem are investigated properly and dealt with, it could be a simple mis understanding, which if explained both parties leave, hopefully happy it has been resolved.
Allowing complaints to go ignored or be fobbed off (I have personal experience of being a VICTIM of this) simply makes people more scared of speaking out, think it is pointless, leads to mis trust and quite bad feelings, to the point where you consider those who fobbed you off as ACCESSORY TO THE CRIME.
Should an employee have to give their employer an ultimatum that the abuse they are being subjected to stops or that person will take legal action under article 3 of the human rights act, that outlaws humiliating and degrading treatment.
The threat of that action worked for me, but I should NEVER have been put into that position in the first place.
Sometimes what may seem an innocent comment can be quite offensive, if handled properly the two parties can be brought together, to explain how each feels, and that generally should result in forgiveness and a better understanding of each other. Esp when it was down to a simple mis understanding.
Paul
OpenPGP_0x8EA91B51E27E3D99.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |