Re: GFDL license help

[Ali Reza Hayati]

Thank you Aaron.

On 09/04/2021 23:08, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> In principle, you could use the GPL straight ahead and even AGPL. That
> would require that anyone who distributes the audio and video would
> actually include the source files, whatever they might be. This gets
> weird. Does it mean all the raw files and audio tracks and the saved
> sessions from editing programs? Maybe. The terms of GPL say that source
> is the preferred form for making changes. So, whatever form that is for
> you, that would be the source files for the text, audio, and video.
>
> I'm not the first to consider this, and there's something to it.
>
> I haven't explored the pros and cons of GFDL for these cases.
>
>
>
> On 2021-04-09 11:18 a.m., Ali Reza Hayati wrote:
> > Hello guys.
> >
> > Can anybody help me with choosing a license for a blog other than
> > Creative Commons? I want to use GNU FDL 1.3 but I'm not sure if that's
> > fine for audio/video too. Can we use GFDL for audio and video too? If
> > not, what copyleft license do you suggest to use, other than Creative
> > Commons ones?
> >
> > Best.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > libreplanet-discuss mailing list
> > libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
> > https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss

--
Ali Reza Hayati (https://alirezahayati.com)
Libre culture activist and privacy advocate
PGP: 88A5 BDB7 E07C 39D0 8132 6412 DCB8 F138 B865 1771

OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature