[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GFDL license help
|
From: |
Ali Reza Hayati |
|
Subject: |
Re: GFDL license help |
|
Date: |
Sun, 11 Apr 2021 19:45:47 +0430 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1 |
On 11/04/2021 00:12, Jean Louis wrote:
Did Creative Commons do that?
Yes. Their signature (name) is on that idiotic so-called open letter.
Well license is license, it does not matter, you may get some images,
clipart under Creative Commons and you need to release it. License is
created by organization, but you do not receive it from organization,
you receive it from the author.
I know. I have no problem using stuff licensed under CC licenses, I just
don't want to publish my works under a CC license.
--
Ali Reza Hayati (https://alirezahayati.com)
Libre culture activist and privacy advocate
PGP: 88A5 BDB7 E07C 39D0 8132 6412 DCB8 F138 B865 1771
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- GFDL license help, Ali Reza Hayati, 2021/04/09
- Re: GFDL license help, Aaron Wolf, 2021/04/09
- Re: GFDL license help, Pedro Lucas Porcellis, 2021/04/09
- Re: GFDL license help, Kesara Rathnayake, 2021/04/10
- Re: GFDL license help, Ali Reza Hayati, 2021/04/10
- Re: GFDL license help, quiliro, 2021/04/12
- Re: GFDL license help, Jean Louis, 2021/04/12
- Re: GFDL license help, quiliro, 2021/04/13
- Re: GFDL license help, Jean Louis, 2021/04/13
- Re: GFDL license help, quiliro, 2021/04/13
Re: GFDL license help, Jean Louis, 2021/04/12
Blog licenses must be diverse - was Re: GFDL license help, Jean Louis, 2021/04/12