[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Re[2]: issue verification
From: |
Jonas Hahnfeld |
Subject: |
Re: Re[2]: issue verification |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Sep 2020 22:34:11 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.36.5 |
Am Donnerstag, den 17.09.2020, 20:30 +0000 schrieb Trevor:
> Jonas, you wrote 17/09/2020 20:32:31
> Subject: Re: issue verification
>
> > The problem I'm seeing is that it would become harder to find the
> > issues to verify: Most of the time, there will be fixed issues for the
> > current version still in development, which cannot be verified. Making
> > everybody wanting to help with verification skip over the same set of
> > issues potentially wastes a lot of time...
> >
> > Jonas
> Maybe I'm misunderstanding the problem, but a list of issues to verify
> for a particular release, say 2.21.4, can be found by
>
> Issues -> Milestones -> Release LilyPond 2.21.4 -> Milestone 2.21.4
> Page down to see a list of completed issues (closed).
>
> These are the ones to verify for 2.21.4 I believe.
Right, that's what we currently have. As far as I understood Jean
wondered if we could move the step of assigning the milestone to
verification? In that case, the described procedure would not work.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- issue verification, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/09/17
- Re: issue verification, Michael Käppler, 2020/09/17
- Re: issue verification, Michael Käppler, 2020/09/17
- Re: issue verification, Michael Käppler, 2020/09/17
- Re: issue verification, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/09/18
- Re: issue verification, Michael Käppler, 2020/09/18
- Re: issue verification, Phil Holmes, 2020/09/18
- Re: issue verification, Michael Käppler, 2020/09/18
- Re: issue verification, Michael Käppler, 2020/09/18
- Re: issue verification, Federico Bruni, 2020/09/18
- Re: issue verification, Jean Abou Samra, 2020/09/18