Re: lynx-dev Dead code tactics: call for comments

[dickey]

> Actually, the source is already under CVS.  The CVS tree just isn't 
> publically available. 

PRCS (but the same idea)
  
> > Of course, there's also the easiest solution of all, 
> >  
> > 5) "Nop."  Do nothing.  Who cares about a few K of binary or tarball? 
> >    PRO: Easy. 
> >    CON: The binary and tar file keep growing. 
>  
> There's a fallacy here.  The binary & tar file keep growing anyway, 
> regardless of what you do.  You only propose to shrink them slightly 
> before continuing.  What you mean is: 

true (I found a long time ago that splitting a file into two pieces gives
two bigger files).
  
>      CON: We don't lower the bar slightly, before continuing to grow the 
>           source and binary as we add new features in the future. 
>  
> >Bela< 

but this is just a distraction - I'm more interested in finishing the
details for gettext and the HTSprintf conversion.  Then, depends on
Klaus/LP/etc (if I list, I'll miss), and we can talk about a new release.


-- 
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey