lynx-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: lynx-dev Dead code tactics: call for comments


From: Klaus Weide
Subject: Re: lynx-dev Dead code tactics: call for comments
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 04:55:08 -0600 (CST)

On Mon, 15 Mar 1999, Leonid Pauzner wrote:

> As of this thread I am very close to KED point of view:

me too.

> 13-Mar-99 15:47 Kim DeVaughn wrote:
> > OTOH, I *can't* see removing small 1 or 2 line fn()'s that form part of
> > a general, orthogonal function-set, even when not currently used.  For
> > example:
> [...]
> 
> > In short, I think deletions should be done on a case-by-case basis,
> > with some value-judgement applied, rather than blindly chopping out
> > *all* unused fn()'s.

Me too.

But removing the unused HTAA* and related stuff is probably a good
idea.  (For me it's been the largest area of code that I never really
looked at; it has been a source of confusion before I learned to ignore
its presence.)

   Klaus
     

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]