[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev Dead code tactics: call for comments
From: |
Leonid Pauzner |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev Dead code tactics: call for comments |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Mar 1999 21:17:01 +0300 (MSK) |
15-Mar-99 04:55 Klaus Weide wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Mar 1999, Leonid Pauzner wrote:
>> As of this thread I am very close to KED point of view:
> me too.
>> 13-Mar-99 15:47 Kim DeVaughn wrote:
>> > OTOH, I *can't* see removing small 1 or 2 line fn()'s that form part of
>> > a general, orthogonal function-set, even when not currently used. For
>> > example:
>> [...]
>>
>> > In short, I think deletions should be done on a case-by-case basis,
>> > with some value-judgement applied, rather than blindly chopping out
>> > *all* unused fn()'s.
> Me too.
> But removing the unused HTAA* and related stuff is probably a good
> idea. (For me it's been the largest area of code that I never really
> looked at; it has been a source of confusion before I learned to ignore
> its presence.)
And this is consists with case-by-case basis:)
> Klaus