[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] MIT-Scheme 9.0.1 performance problem. (cont.)
From: |
Przemysław Soboń |
Subject: |
Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] MIT-Scheme 9.0.1 performance problem. (cont.) |
Date: |
Mon, 16 May 2011 14:26:05 +0200 |
> Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 23:28:03 +0200
> From: =?UTF-8?B?UHJ6ZW15c8WCYXcgU29ib8WE?= <address@hidden>
>
> Do you mean to compile a band file and use it later?
>
> No, I mean to compile your Scheme code to machine code. See
> <http://www.mit-scheme.org/documentation/mit-scheme-user/Compiling-Programs.html>.
>
Thank you Taylor very much for your suggestion. After compilation the
loop is executed in 0.5 second what makes me really happy.
Unfortunately I have another problem while compiling my code. It is
related to macros. To show the problem I took a simple macro from the
reference manual:
(define-syntax push1
(syntax-rules ()
((push1 item list)
(set! list (cons item list)))))
Then I use it in the following way:
(define lst (list 1 2 3))
(push1 12 lst)
(pp lst)
The output is (12 1 2 3)
Everything works perfect if I have the macro and execution part in one
file. I compile the file and execute and get the results as expected.
The problems occur when I move the macro to another file. Then it
seems like the compiler treats the execution of push1 as a procedure
call and not a macro. I get an error: "Variable reference to a
syntactic keyword: push1". I have some shared macros and don't want to
copy them to all the other files.
I tried many options like compiling the both files, load the file with
macro before compilation. Include the macro file in a band file and
load it before compilation. Nothing works.
Thanks in advance,
Przemek
- [MIT-Scheme-devel] MIT-Scheme 9.0.1 performance problem. (cont.), Przemysław Soboń, 2011/05/13
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] MIT-Scheme 9.0.1 performance problem. (cont.), Taylor R Campbell, 2011/05/13
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] MIT-Scheme 9.0.1 performance problem. (cont.), Przemysław Soboń, 2011/05/13
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] MIT-Scheme 9.0.1 performance problem. (cont.), Taylor R Campbell, 2011/05/13
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] MIT-Scheme 9.0.1 performance problem. (cont.),
Przemysław Soboń <=
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] MIT-Scheme 9.0.1 performance problem. (cont.), Taylor R Campbell, 2011/05/16
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] MIT-Scheme 9.0.1 performance problem. (cont.), Przemysław Soboń, 2011/05/16
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] MIT-Scheme 9.0.1 performance problem. (cont.), Arthur A. Gleckler, 2011/05/16
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] MIT-Scheme 9.0.1 performance problem. (cont.), Przemysław Soboń, 2011/05/16
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] MIT-Scheme 9.0.1 performance problem. (cont.), Arthur A. Gleckler, 2011/05/17
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] MIT-Scheme 9.0.1 performance problem. (cont.), Peter Feigl, 2011/05/16
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] MIT-Scheme 9.0.1 performance problem. (cont.), Przemysław Soboń, 2011/05/16
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] MIT-Scheme 9.0.1 performance problem. (cont.), Taylor R Campbell, 2011/05/16
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] MIT-Scheme 9.0.1 performance problem. (cont.), Przemysław Soboń, 2011/05/16