[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] MIT-Scheme 9.0.1 performance problem. (cont.)
From: |
Taylor R Campbell |
Subject: |
Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] MIT-Scheme 9.0.1 performance problem. (cont.) |
Date: |
Mon, 16 May 2011 15:04:04 +0000 |
User-agent: |
IMAIL/1.21; Edwin/3.116; MIT-Scheme/9.1 |
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 14:26:05 +0200
From: =?UTF-8?B?UHJ6ZW15c8WCYXcgU29ib8WE?= <address@hidden>
Everything works perfect if I have the macro and execution part in one
file. I compile the file and execute and get the results as expected.
The problems occur when I move the macro to another file. Then it
seems like the compiler treats the execution of push1 as a procedure
call and not a macro. I get an error: "Variable reference to a
syntactic keyword: push1". I have some shared macros and don't want to
copy them to all the other files.
This is because macros in MIT Scheme are a mess, I'm afraid...
The rule is that if luser.scm uses a macro defined in definer.scm,
then you must load definer.scm before compiling luser.scm.
- [MIT-Scheme-devel] MIT-Scheme 9.0.1 performance problem. (cont.), Przemysław Soboń, 2011/05/13
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] MIT-Scheme 9.0.1 performance problem. (cont.), Taylor R Campbell, 2011/05/13
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] MIT-Scheme 9.0.1 performance problem. (cont.), Przemysław Soboń, 2011/05/13
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] MIT-Scheme 9.0.1 performance problem. (cont.), Taylor R Campbell, 2011/05/13
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] MIT-Scheme 9.0.1 performance problem. (cont.), Przemysław Soboń, 2011/05/16
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] MIT-Scheme 9.0.1 performance problem. (cont.),
Taylor R Campbell <=
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] MIT-Scheme 9.0.1 performance problem. (cont.), Przemysław Soboń, 2011/05/16
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] MIT-Scheme 9.0.1 performance problem. (cont.), Arthur A. Gleckler, 2011/05/16
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] MIT-Scheme 9.0.1 performance problem. (cont.), Przemysław Soboń, 2011/05/16
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] MIT-Scheme 9.0.1 performance problem. (cont.), Arthur A. Gleckler, 2011/05/17
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] MIT-Scheme 9.0.1 performance problem. (cont.), Peter Feigl, 2011/05/16
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] MIT-Scheme 9.0.1 performance problem. (cont.), Przemysław Soboń, 2011/05/16
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] MIT-Scheme 9.0.1 performance problem. (cont.), Taylor R Campbell, 2011/05/16
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] MIT-Scheme 9.0.1 performance problem. (cont.), Przemysław Soboń, 2011/05/16