[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Mldonkey-users] Lost files.ini, perforate_file still necessary?
From: |
Sven Hartge |
Subject: |
[Mldonkey-users] Lost files.ini, perforate_file still necessary? |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Dec 2002 03:06:27 +0100 |
User-agent: |
tin/1.5.14-20020926 ("Soil") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.20-112 (i586)) |
Hi.
I was dumb again and lost my files.ini and files.ini.old. recover_temp
worked well so far, only all downloads are back to 0.
This happened to me some time ago and Goswin Brederlow was so kind to
implement the perforate_file command which checks the temp-file against
the chunk-md4s to see if the chunk is already present.
But I have a feeling the 2.01+CVS versions already do this themselves
when there are new bytes received for a file.
So: Can I safely resume my downloads without losing the already
downloaded bytes? (have to redownload about 5GB with an ISDN link is
painful, so I want to prevent this at all costs)
S°
--
75 Things you don't want to hear from your Sys Admin.
37. I remember the last time I saw it do that...
- [Mldonkey-users] Lost files.ini, perforate_file still necessary?,
Sven Hartge <=