mldonkey-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Mldonkey-users] Overnet news


From: Goswin Brederlow
Subject: Re: [Mldonkey-users] Overnet news
Date: 22 Jan 2003 03:13:10 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Military Intelligence)

Fabian Henrici <address@hidden> writes:

> same with me, after 20 hours and about 5000 seen hosts in ovstats I
> still haven't downloaded anything from overnet.
> 
> 
> Jarek Hirny wrote:
> > http://www.slyck.com/news.php?story=39
> > --- cut ---
> 
> > On  the 15th and 16th of this month, MetaMachine expressed concern
> > regarding
> 
> > the  adverse  affects  mlDonkey  on  the  Overnet  community. In addition to
> > limiting mlDonkey, there are many new changes since the last update.
> > · All connections will timeout
> 
> > · Check firewalled status with 3 people
> > · Republishes your location after your buddy changes
> > · Much easier to connect to firewalled dudes
> > · Hashes of temp files now cached
> > · Colors for availability
> > · Fixed problem with strange search results
> > · Add upload requests to sources
> > · Improved contactlist freshness
> > · No longer publishes too early
> > You can get this program from FileForum.com here.
> 
> > http://fileforum.betanews.com/detail.php3?fid=1040682361
> > --- cut ---
> 
> > No  info  on  overnet.com  mainpage, though. I'm wondering, what
> > changes did
> 
> > they apply... and what do they want to limit, since:
> >             Total downloads:         4119358384
> 
> >                     Overnet:              92160 (0.00 %)
> > --

Uptime: 95973 seconds (1+02:39)
            Total downloads:         1345120409
                    eDonkey:          879722644 (65.40 %)
               old mldonkey:              49152 (0.00 %)
               new mldonkey:           46266869 (3.44 %)
                    Overnet:          162451352 (12.08 %)
                  old eMule:                  0 (0.00 %)
                  new eMule:          256630392 (19.08 %)
                     server:                  0 (0.00 %)

Seems fine to me.

MfG
        Goswin




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]