|
From: | John W. Eaton |
Subject: | [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #65244] Simplify code complexity of perms.cc |
Date: | Thu, 8 Feb 2024 11:14:36 -0500 (EST) |
Follow-up Comment #3, bug#65244 (group octave): "Alternatively, would it make sense to add a check that `ar_in.numel ()` doesn't exceed INT_MAX (or another reasonable limit)?" This problem seems like something we should examine and make a decision about for many Octave functions where I we use int to hold the value returned from numel. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?65244> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.gnu.org/
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |