|
| From: | Markus Mützel |
| Subject: | [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #65244] Simplify code complexity of perms.cc |
| Date: | Fri, 9 Feb 2024 04:26:05 -0500 (EST) |
Follow-up Comment #7, bug#65244 (group octave):
The changes look good to me in general. I'm not so sure about the part
concerning `long double` though. This would be the first time that that type
would be used unconditionally in Octave.
They are used conditionally in `octave_int<T>`. But that is guarded by
`OCTAVE_INT_USE_LONG_DOUBLE`.
ISTR that `long double` are a mess when it comes to cross-platform
compatibility. Is it save to use them unconditionally here?
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?65244>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |