[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: benchmarks - sort
From: |
David Bateman |
Subject: |
Re: benchmarks - sort |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Jan 2004 22:41:09 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
Daprès Paul Thomas <address@hidden> (le 22/01/2004):
> In conclusion, I will use your sort algorithm but found mine to be an
> interesting exercise.
Except that the version I previously sent, I introduced a bug when fixing
a seg-fault. The result was that it didn't always do the last merge. The
fix unfortunately slows things up a bit, though at worst case "b=sort(a)"
is only 1.5 times as long as matlab, and still much better for partially
ordered lists....
I attach the patch, in case you want to test it, but will try and commit
the code...
Cheers
David
--
David Bateman address@hidden
Motorola CRM +33 1 69 35 48 04 (Ph)
Parc Les Algorithmes, Commune de St Aubin +33 1 69 35 77 01 (Fax)
91193 Gif-Sur-Yvette FRANCE
The information contained in this communication has been classified as:
[x] General Business Information
[ ] Motorola Internal Use Only
[ ] Motorola Confidential Proprietary
patch.gz
Description: Binary data
- Re: benchmarks - sort, (continued)
RE: benchmarks - sort, THOMAS Paul Richard, 2004/01/22
Re: benchmarks - sort, Paul Thomas, 2004/01/22
- Re: benchmarks - sort,
David Bateman <=