[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: startup time (was: 3 smaller issues: stratup and 2 readline)
From: |
Levente Torok |
Subject: |
Re: startup time (was: 3 smaller issues: stratup and 2 readline) |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Sep 2008 21:59:58 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405) |
On Wednesday 10 September 2008, you wrote:
> On 10-Sep-2008, Levente Torok wrote:
>
> | 1) Starting the octave-3 is very slow compared to 2.1.x versions.
> | Is it known what causes this slowing down?
> | Is it some sort of cache generation from the functions that are accessible
> on path?
> | Is there any way to speed it up?
>
> The load-path code completely changed going from 2.1.x to 3.0. Now
> Octave scans all directories in the load-path at startup. It only
> takes a second or so for Octave to start on my system. What do you
> mean by "very slow"? Do you have network filesystems in your
> load-path?
>
> jwe
>
For me, the start up of oct-3 takes 13-18 seconds.
(Certainly, I have many octave forge packages installed. )
In case of octave 2.x: it was 0.099 - .15 second.
Matlab 2007b starts up in 13-22 seconds.
Levente
--
Blogger of http://fapuma.blogspot.com
- 3 smaller issues: stratup and 2 readline, Levente Torok, 2008/09/10
- startup time (was: 3 smaller issues: stratup and 2 readline), John W. Eaton, 2008/09/10
- Re: startup time (was: 3 smaller issues: stratup and 2 readline),
Levente Torok <=
- Message not available
- Re: startup time, Levente Torok, 2008/09/11
- Re: startup time, John W. Eaton, 2008/09/11
- Re: startup time, Levente Torok, 2008/09/11
- Re: startup time, John W. Eaton, 2008/09/11
- Re: startup time, Levente Torok, 2008/09/11
- Re: startup time, John W. Eaton, 2008/09/11
readline (was: 3 smaller issues: stratup and 2 readline), John W. Eaton, 2008/09/10