[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: startup time
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: startup time |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Sep 2008 10:05:46 -0400 |
On 11-Sep-2008, Levente Torok wrote:
| On Thursday 11 September 2008, you wrote:
| > Levente Torok wrote:
| > > On Wednesday 10 September 2008, you wrote:
| > >
| > >> The load-path code completely changed going from 2.1.x to 3.0. Now
| > >> Octave scans all directories in the load-path at startup. It only
| > >> takes a second or so for Octave to start on my system. What do you
| > >> mean by "very slow"? Do you have network filesystems in your
| > >> load-path?
| > > For me, the start up of oct-3 takes 13-18 seconds.
| > > (Certainly, I have many octave forge packages installed. )
| > > In case of octave 2.x: it was 0.099 - .15 second.
| > > Matlab 2007b starts up in 13-22 seconds.
| > Are you running Windows or Linux? If Windows, then scanning the
| > load-path probably explains the difference because in my experience
| > windows is much slower than linux statting directories. (Anecdotally
| > not definitively tested.)
|
| I use ubuntu.5Gb of memory.
And, as I asked earlier, are the directories in your load path on a
local disk, or mounted from some network file server?
jwe
- 3 smaller issues: stratup and 2 readline, Levente Torok, 2008/09/10
- startup time (was: 3 smaller issues: stratup and 2 readline), John W. Eaton, 2008/09/10
- Re: startup time (was: 3 smaller issues: stratup and 2 readline), Levente Torok, 2008/09/10
- Message not available
- Re: startup time, Levente Torok, 2008/09/11
- Re: startup time,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: startup time, Levente Torok, 2008/09/11
- Re: startup time, John W. Eaton, 2008/09/11
- Re: startup time, Levente Torok, 2008/09/11
- Re: startup time, John W. Eaton, 2008/09/11
readline (was: 3 smaller issues: stratup and 2 readline), John W. Eaton, 2008/09/10