[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: startup time
From: |
Levente Torok |
Subject: |
Re: startup time |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Sep 2008 10:43:09 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405) |
On Thursday 11 September 2008, you wrote:
> Levente Torok wrote:
> > On Wednesday 10 September 2008, you wrote:
> >
> >> The load-path code completely changed going from 2.1.x to 3.0. Now
> >> Octave scans all directories in the load-path at startup. It only
> >> takes a second or so for Octave to start on my system. What do you
> >> mean by "very slow"? Do you have network filesystems in your
> >> load-path?
> > For me, the start up of oct-3 takes 13-18 seconds.
> > (Certainly, I have many octave forge packages installed. )
> > In case of octave 2.x: it was 0.099 - .15 second.
> > Matlab 2007b starts up in 13-22 seconds.
> Are you running Windows or Linux? If Windows, then scanning the
> load-path probably explains the difference because in my experience
> windows is much slower than linux statting directories. (Anecdotally
> not definitively tested.)
I use ubuntu.5Gb of memory.
Levente
--
Blogger of http://fapuma.blogspot.com
- 3 smaller issues: stratup and 2 readline, Levente Torok, 2008/09/10
- startup time (was: 3 smaller issues: stratup and 2 readline), John W. Eaton, 2008/09/10
- Re: startup time (was: 3 smaller issues: stratup and 2 readline), Levente Torok, 2008/09/10
- Message not available
- Re: startup time,
Levente Torok <=
- Re: startup time, John W. Eaton, 2008/09/11
- Re: startup time, Levente Torok, 2008/09/11
- Re: startup time, John W. Eaton, 2008/09/11
- Re: startup time, Levente Torok, 2008/09/11
- Re: startup time, John W. Eaton, 2008/09/11
readline (was: 3 smaller issues: stratup and 2 readline), John W. Eaton, 2008/09/10