[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Pan-users] Click on URL in a post??
From: |
Eric Ortega |
Subject: |
Re: [Pan-users] Click on URL in a post?? |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Dec 2002 13:04:48 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 01:36:25PM -0700, Duncan wrote:
> However, upon further investigation, there IS a /bin/vim-minimal that's an
> actual executable of 421.5 KB. It's likely that it's stand-alone, or at
> least doesn't require anything on /usr. However, that moniker does seem a
> bit less-than-intuitive. ... I just did an rpm -qi vim-minimal, as I
> remembered seeing it listed during a few of my urpmi update sessions, and
> confirmed that yes, "The vim-minimal package includes a minimal version of
> VIM, which is installed into /bin/vi for use when only the root partition is
> present."
As opposed to going through packaging, you can try 'ldd /bin/vim-minimal'
to see the dependencies. This, in an empirical sense, will probably be
more "valid" than whatever the package maintainer said, AFAIK.
On my machine:
gee ~> ldd /bin/vi
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x4001a000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000)
ObPan:
gee ~> ldd /usr/bin/pan (version 0.13.2)
libgtkspell.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgtkspell.so.0 (0x4001a000)
libpspell.so.4 => /usr/lib/libpspell.so.4 (0x40029000)
libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 (0x40046000)
libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 (0x40247000)
libatk-1.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libatk-1.0.so.0 (0x4029f000)
libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 (0x402b4000)
libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x402c6000)
libpangoxft-1.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpangoxft-1.0.so.0 (0x402e8000)
libpangox-1.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpangox-1.0.so.0 (0x40307000)
libpango-1.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0 (0x40313000)
libgobject-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 (0x40343000)
libgmodule-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.0 (0x40379000)
libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x4037d000)
libglib-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 (0x40381000)
libxml2.so.2 => /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2 (0x403e5000)
libz.so.1 => /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0x4049b000)
libgthread-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.0 (0x404aa000)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x404af000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x404ff000)
libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 => /usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3
(0x40613000)
libltdl.so.3 => /usr/lib/libltdl.so.3 (0x4065d000)
libpspell-modules.so.1 => /usr/lib/libpspell-modules.so.1 (0x40663000)
libXi.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXi.so.6 (0x40665000)
libXft.so.1 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.so.1 (0x4066d000)
libXrender.so.1 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXrender.so.1 (0x40696000)
libXext.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x4069c000)
libX11.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x406aa000)
libfreetype.so.6 => /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 (0x40785000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000)
gah!!! :)
> Thanks. I now know that for next time. (Still, can't see putting that on a
> rescue floppy... However, since the install CDs can be used for rescue, I
> assume they use that instead, and can afford the nearly half a meg.)
vim, even compiled with minimal options, is a non-minimal type thing. :|
I don't know why they don't just include a little, tiny /bin/vi. *shrug*
- Re: OT: Re: [Pan-users] Click on URL in a post??, (continued)
- Re: [Pan-users] Click on URL in a post??, Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom, 2002/12/13
- Re: [Pan-users] Click on URL in a post??, Eric Ortega, 2002/12/13
- Re: [Pan-users] Click on URL in a post??, Duncan, 2002/12/13
- Re: [Pan-users] Click on URL in a post??, Eric Ortega, 2002/12/16
- Re: [Pan-users] Click on URL in a post??, John J. LeMay Jr., 2002/12/16
- Re: [Pan-users] Click on URL in a post??, Eric Ortega, 2002/12/16
- Re: [Pan-users] Click on URL in a post??, Duncan, 2002/12/16
- Re: [Pan-users] Click on URL in a post??,
Eric Ortega <=
- Re: [Pan-users] Click on URL in a post??, Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom, 2002/12/16
- Re: [Pan-users] Click on URL in a post??, Duncan, 2002/12/16
- Re: [Pan-users] Click on URL in a post??, Mark Janssen, 2002/12/17