[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Pan-users] Re: OT: calling all old-timers -- using * for attributions
From: |
Jim Henderson |
Subject: |
[Pan-users] Re: OT: calling all old-timers -- using * for attributions |
Date: |
Tue, 3 Nov 2009 17:38:54 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Pan/0.132 (Waxed in Black) |
On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:03:19 +0000, Robert Marshall wrote:
> I go back to the late 80's too in usenet use - I can recall a variety of
> prefix characters for quoting but not *'s - they were used - as in your
> reply for emphasis
Yeah, that's what I remember seeing then as well. In fact, the common
usage of "/" for denoting emphasis is relatively new as I recall.
> I've just looked up the 1993 version of the supercite manual
>
> http://www.fnal.gov/docs/products/emacs/v19_34/sc_1.html
>
> (I used to use this) and that only (on a quick scan) seems to mention
> >'s quoting - apart from its own style of citation using name>
I do remember that style of quoting as well - when it got more than one
level deep, it was pretty hard to follow. I think the reduction to ">"
was a way of controlling that better.
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please keep on-topic replies on the list so everyone benefits