qemu-arm
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v6 05/20] target/arm: Split out rebuild_hflags_m32


From: Alex Bennée
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 05/20] target/arm: Split out rebuild_hflags_m32
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 17:13:06 +0100
User-agent: mu4e 1.3.5; emacs 27.0.50

Richard Henderson <address@hidden> writes:

> Create a function to compute the values of the TBFLAG_A32 bits
> that will be cached, and are used by M-profile.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <address@hidden>

Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <address@hidden>

> ---
>  target/arm/helper.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c
> index 4c65476d93..d4303420da 100644
> --- a/target/arm/helper.c
> +++ b/target/arm/helper.c
> @@ -11083,6 +11083,29 @@ static uint32_t rebuild_hflags_common_32(CPUARMState 
> *env, int fp_el,
>      return rebuild_hflags_common(env, fp_el, mmu_idx, flags);
>  }
>
> +static uint32_t rebuild_hflags_m32(CPUARMState *env, int fp_el,
> +                                   ARMMMUIdx mmu_idx)
> +{
> +    uint32_t flags = 0;
> +
> +    if (arm_v7m_is_handler_mode(env)) {
> +        flags = FIELD_DP32(flags, TBFLAG_A32, HANDLER, 1);
> +    }
> +
> +    /*
> +     * v8M always applies stack limit checks unless CCR.STKOFHFNMIGN
> +     * is suppressing them because the requested execution priority
> +     * is less than 0.
> +     */
> +    if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_V8) &&
> +        !((mmu_idx & ARM_MMU_IDX_M_NEGPRI) &&
> +          (env->v7m.ccr[env->v7m.secure] & R_V7M_CCR_STKOFHFNMIGN_MASK))) {
> +        flags = FIELD_DP32(flags, TBFLAG_A32, STACKCHECK, 1);
> +    }
> +
> +    return rebuild_hflags_common_32(env, fp_el, mmu_idx, flags);
> +}
> +
>  static uint32_t rebuild_hflags_a64(CPUARMState *env, int el, int fp_el,
>                                     ARMMMUIdx mmu_idx)
>  {
> @@ -11168,7 +11191,13 @@ void cpu_get_tb_cpu_state(CPUARMState *env, 
> target_ulong *pc,
>          }
>      } else {
>          *pc = env->regs[15];
> -        flags = rebuild_hflags_common_32(env, fp_el, mmu_idx, 0);
> +
> +        if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_M)) {
> +            flags = rebuild_hflags_m32(env, fp_el, mmu_idx);
> +        } else {
> +            flags = rebuild_hflags_common_32(env, fp_el, mmu_idx, 0);
> +        }
> +
>          flags = FIELD_DP32(flags, TBFLAG_A32, THUMB, env->thumb);
>          flags = FIELD_DP32(flags, TBFLAG_A32, VECLEN, env->vfp.vec_len);
>          flags = FIELD_DP32(flags, TBFLAG_A32, VECSTRIDE, 
> env->vfp.vec_stride);
> @@ -11204,20 +11233,6 @@ void cpu_get_tb_cpu_state(CPUARMState *env, 
> target_ulong *pc,
>          }
>      }
>
> -    if (arm_v7m_is_handler_mode(env)) {
> -        flags = FIELD_DP32(flags, TBFLAG_A32, HANDLER, 1);
> -    }
> -
> -    /* v8M always applies stack limit checks unless CCR.STKOFHFNMIGN is
> -     * suppressing them because the requested execution priority is less 
> than 0.
> -     */
> -    if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_V8) &&
> -        arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_M) &&
> -        !((mmu_idx  & ARM_MMU_IDX_M_NEGPRI) &&
> -          (env->v7m.ccr[env->v7m.secure] & R_V7M_CCR_STKOFHFNMIGN_MASK))) {
> -        flags = FIELD_DP32(flags, TBFLAG_A32, STACKCHECK, 1);
> -    }
> -
>      if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_M_SECURITY) &&
>          FIELD_EX32(env->v7m.fpccr[M_REG_S], V7M_FPCCR, S) != 
> env->v7m.secure) {
>          flags = FIELD_DP32(flags, TBFLAG_A32, FPCCR_S_WRONG, 1);


--
Alex Bennée



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]